Apostate Gallery

Share this post

N-Gate

apostategallery.substack.com

N-Gate

& its meta-political implications

Apostate
Mar 2, 2022
3
2
Share this post

N-Gate

apostategallery.substack.com

A couple of weeks ago, based-anon Skeletal Kashi, a long time friend of Apostate Gallery, delivered perhaps the definitive account of the meta-political implications of ‘Nigger Gate’ — Joe Rogan’s apologyocalypse, which singlehandedly torched his ‘dissident’ status.

Rogan’s utter, self-humiliating, capitulation to the Regime provided Kashi with the ideal exemplar of what a devastating political weapon the N-word had become. However, what made his analysis exceptional was the precision with which he dissected the N-word’s philosophical / occult underpinnings.

The Regime functions on a Neoreligious OS, which runs a ‘negrolatry’ control protocol. White people, out of guilt inculcated by the ‘original sin’ of slavery, inter-spliced with the mythology of Nazi eugenics, have imbued black people with the status of ‘sacred objects’ within a ‘white guilt’ based belief system / theology.

Negrolatry is the worship / holding scared of black people by white people under the current Regime. Other groups / people (e.g. women, gays, trans and Jews) are also held sacred, but black people occupy a special place / role within the theology of the system, which provides the metaphysical underpinnings legitimating / organising surface level operational vectors of jurisdiction / control.

Kashi is exceptionally clear on the weaponised dualism of The Word. Put simply, one class of people (black people) are permitted to say The Word freely, with pride and wild abandon, ostensibly in order to ‘reclaim’ The Word from their white oppressors / overlords. Meanwhile, another class of people (white people) are forbidden, on pain of death, from uttering The Word. If they choose to do so regardless, then firing / cancellation and social ostracisation are all encoded as appropriate / mandatory remedial consequences for what is essentially the transgression of Neoreligious taboo.

For Kashi, Rogan’s ritualised / pseudo-volitional, self-abnegation provided the perfect proof-of-work of the fundamentally asymmetrical, weaponised dualism of The Word.

Below Apostate Gallery has reproduced Kashi’s ‘On Saying the N-word’ Twitter thread in full (please don’t forget to click through and give him a follow):

Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
On Saying the N-word: a thread. (Disclaimer: I am a black man and in no way endorse the term. This thread is pure observation) 1/ In 2022, the single most important issue distinguishing a true dissident from a fake one is whether or not they are willing to say the N-word
Image
5:45 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
3,423Likes590Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
2/ Saying the N-word, more than any other single act, signals psychological freedom from the Regime. There are a few reasons for this. First, it is legible. Second, it is a pure issue of faith. Third, it is the most sacred taboo in the current moral order.
5:46 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
1,054Likes58Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
3/ I should clarify at the outset that "saying the N-word" need not involve *calling* someone the N-word let alone doing so pejoratively. The concept of the "use-mention distinction" is useful here. Saying the N-word when, e.g., reading Huck Finn also counts
Image
5:49 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
869Likes24Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
4/ Back to the significance of saying it, though. First: Legibility. Few rules are as clearly-defined within the prevailing moral order as that governing the N-word. Simply put, only black people (such as myself) are allowed to say it. It is wrong for anyone else to do so.
5:49 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
601Likes10Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
5/ People can debate the sense of this rule, but its clarity is unquestionable. Unlike, say, the ever-changing pronoun terminology (which non-elites frequently find incomprehensible) the N-word rule is understood by all. Breaking the rule is therefore a presumptively hostile act.
5:50 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
607Likes13Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
6/ Second: it is an issue of pure faith. What do I mean by this? Many issues, though they carry a moral valence, are tinged by factual considerations. How great are the biological differences between men and women? Even if there is an accepted answer, the question is empirical.
5:51 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
527Likes8Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
7/ Disagreement with the politically favored position can in the former case be cast as mere factual quibbling - by the quibbler if by no one else. To dispute such positions does not commit one to heresy. It is compatible with accepting the Regime's values. Not so with the N-word
5:52 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
469Likes6Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
8/ One's attitude toward the N-word, on the other hand, is exclusively a question of value. It is either categorically bad, or it is not. The answer does not depend on experimentation or discovery. It is a commandment. To use the word necessarily means rejecting the moral order.
5:54 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
524Likes14Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
9/ This is not some alien concept, but a linguistic taboo of the sort that humans have always held. The Ancient Jews considered it blasphemy to speak God's true name and instead used euphemisms such as HaShem ("the name") or Adonai ("the lord"). It is common religious behavior
5:57 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
570Likes19Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
10/ Third: It is the most sacred taboo. Given the Regime's hierarchy of identities, it is unsurprising that its most sacred taboo would surround black people (such as myself). This is not the only reason the taboo is sacred, though. Rather, it is sacred because it is absurd.
6:00 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
530Likes10Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
11/ A statement's capacity to break your will scales in direct proportion to its absurdity. The sillier an idea, the more you degrade yourself by affirming it. You all know The Emperor's New Clothes. Did you know the Chinese have their own version?
en.wikibooks.orgChinese Stories/Calling a deer a horse - Wikibooks, open books for an open world
6:06 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
616Likes37Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
12/ That's because it's a universal human truth. Contradictions hold power. This is why every religion has its holy mysteries. Questions that theologians are allowed to ponder, but which the laity must accept. The moral duality of the N-word is one such holy mystery.
6:06 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
513Likes10Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
13/ Linguistic taboo is irrational, certainly. It feels primitive. That's why nobody takes swearing seriously anymore. They're just sounds, man! But it's child's play as far as holy mysteries go. A word that's good or evil depending on who says it - that's on a different level.
6:07 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
572Likes19Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
14/ To blast a word constantly on the radio and then destroy people's lives if they sing along is just too powerful. It's irresistible to the human religious impulse. No other taboo compares. If a person can break this one, the rest are trivial.
nytimes.comA Racial Slur, a Viral Video, and a Reckoning (Published 2020)A white high school student withdrew from her chosen college after a three-second video caused an uproar online. The classmate who shared it publicly has no regrets.
6:08 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
827Likes67Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
15/ One might think that the most obvious objections to Regime ideology would be the easiest to state, or the most common. But in fact it's the opposite. The more glaring a contradiction, the more forcefully it needs to be affirmed. The most absurd demand is the most fundamental.
6:08 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
511Likes12Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
16/ The N-word taboo is not just a fetish - a sacramental object that appeals to our most superstitious impulses - it is the central tenet of our civic religion. The CNN article I posted at the start of this thread states this more or less outright.
Image
Image
Image
Image
6:09 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
539Likes30Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
17/ You can measure people's true beliefs, their true religious commitments, by their attitude toward the term. If a Christian will debate an abortionist but won't even engage with someone who is known to have said the N-word, that tells you what they really think is important.
6:10 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
706Likes62Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
18/ It is not a good idea for most people to say The Word in public. But a true dissident must be willing to say the word in private. This is, unironically, the most important political issue of all. If someone can't break the conditioning, they aren't really free.
6:11 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
619Likes38Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
19/ When Joe Rogan not only apologized for using the term, but reaffirmed the taboo in full "it's not okay for a white person to use that word, even in context" he abdicated any claim to independent thought. Why bother dissenting if you cant reject this?
instagram.comLogin • InstagramWelcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.
6:15 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
797Likes47Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
20/ Addendum: it is generally speaking wrong to call someone the N-word as an insult. It is rude and unbecoming of the speaker, as is the use of any swear word. Like the F-word, or the S-word, it has no place in polite discussion. We should all strive to treat each other nicely.
6:16 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
648Likes14Retweets
Twitter avatar for @relevantmena
Skeletal Kashi @relevantmena
21/ We can agree to this point without making The Word into an idol, overstating its significance, or disregarding the context of its use. That is the attitude that a mature and well-adjusted adult has toward language. We are all adults here, aren't we?
6:17 PM ∙ Feb 14, 2022
844Likes22Retweets

Apostate Gallery is somewhat less optimistic than Kashi on the question of ‘adults in the room’ rationally persuading the Regime to abandon the theological trap of racialised language games, which have become central to its metaphysical underpinnings / condition.

As Nick Land wrote over a decade ago in his Dark Enlightenment series of essays:

At its most abstract and all-encompassing, the liberal-progressive racial dialectic abolishes its outside, along with any possibility of principled consistency. It asserts — at one and the same time — that race does not exist, and that its socially-constructed pseudo-existence is an instrument of inter-racial violence. Racial recognition is both mandatory, and forbidden. Racial identities are meticulously catalogued for purposes of social remedy, hate crime detection, and disparate impact studies, targeting groups for ‘positive discrimination’, ‘affirmative action’, or ‘diversity promotion’ (to list these terms in their rough order of historical substitution), even as they are denounced as meaningless (by the United Nations, no less), and dismissed as malicious stereotypes, corresponding to nothing real. Extreme racial sensitivity and absolute racial desensitization are demanded simultaneously. Race is everything and nothing. There is no way out.

Race and its linguistic signifiers are an operationalised theological trap, predicated on contradictions heightened to the status of paradox. A literally maddening minefield of identity politic doublespeak. A Schrödingerian sign-based control protocol, which employs systematised semiotic relativity, combined with the higher-function of the sovereign Regime to decide the exception. A system of anti-rectification, which administers punitive intermissions of transitory rectification, momentarily illuminating the semantic shadows in which Power conceals itself.

There is, of course, much more to be said about all this. Apostate Galley intends to dig deeper into the semiotic contradictions, which act as Schrödingerian nodes, within the Neoreligious mainframe running the Regime’s control protocols.

2
Share this post

N-Gate

apostategallery.substack.com
2 Comments
Nathan Smith
Jul 1, 2022Liked by Apostate

"A Schrödingerian sign-based control protocol, which employs systematised semiotic relativity, combined with the higher-function of the sovereign Regime to decide the exception. A system of anti-rectification, which administers punitive intermissions of transitory rectification, momentarily illuminating the semantic shadows in which Power conceals itself."

Please hear this as positive feedback: writing like a leftist will not make you friends on the right

Expand full comment
Reply
1 reply by Apostate
1 more comment…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Apostate
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing